OPINIONS / COLUMNS  (July 28 – August 3, 2008)

 

In-Depth

Juan L. Mercado

Leaving square one

 

“Stupid” snorted Senator Panfilo Lacson of some Catholic bishops’ opposition to the reproductive health bill.  “Uninformed objections”, scoffed Rep. Edcel Lagman.

Archbishop Jesus Dosado, earlier, cast into “exterior darkness” those who promote abortion.  They’d be denied communion in Ozamis.  Repeating her call for “dialog”, President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo met with Cardinal Ricardo Vidal and three prelates.

Population deals with creatures “able to trace the stars… and feel a passion for eternity”, Edwin Markham wrote. That explains today’s “gnashing of teeth”.

Did this dialog ever leave square one?

 “For more than 30 years now, the ‘population debate’ divided segments of Philippine society,” sociologist John Carroll, SJ, notes.  It’s been marred “by mutual suspicions, one-sided arguments and caricatures of opposing positions.”

“The outcome has been two groups, each dominated by its more ‘hard-line’ spokespersons,” he writes in “A Balancing Act,” (They) “talk past each other without taking time to listen.... We must move past the deadlocked debate into an area of respectful discussion…”

“Dialog is not meant to give us a common policy,” the prize-winning book “Living Together” notes. “But it teaches us how to live without one, if need be. It can make us accept our differences.”

Can we begin with undisputed facts?

Start with today’s 88,574,614 Filipinos. All agree there are four of us now where, in 1948, there was only one.

Every day, 5,800 kids – equal to three barangays – are born. One doesn’t need a crystal bowl to tally how much more food, water, shelter, medicine, etc they’ll   need over the next 365 days. You can not say “tomorrow” to these children “Their name is today.”

Rapid population growth is not the sole cause of poverty. There’s concurrence on that too “Bad governance, high wealth and income inequality and weak economic growth are major factors,” Ernesto Pernia of UP School of Economics stresses.

Blinkered numbers-equals-hunger PR doesn’t help. Ex-president Joseph Estrada reduces the controversy to “libido”. The poor have “no other past time”, he chortles. So, Catholics should agree to contraception. Indeed, Erap remains the best argument for condoms.

There’s consensus, though,   that landless workers, scavengers or daily wage earners—with six, seven, eight kids—find it tougher to break out of penury.

Studies like “Population Matters” (Oxford University Press) to those by UP’s Aresneio Balisacan and Dennis Mapa or Ateneo’s Cielito Habito stress this point. Out of 189 countries, the Philippines ranked a sorry 86 in children who died before reaching age 5, UNICEF reports.

“The Progress of Peoples” and other Papal documents denounce poverty that degrades.  Indigence mars the daily lives of six out of ten Filipinos. “Listen to your lives,” Frederick Buechener writes. “If God speaks anywhere, it is into our personal lives that He speaks.”

Abortion is a no-no.  In fact, it’s a criminal offense. Pending reproductive health care bills “do not legalize abortion,” the Inquirer notes. Dosado “mischaracterized the entire range of artificial family planning methods as all abortifacient”.

But Lagman and Co.  belatedly excised  an abortion-on-demand provision  they carelessly scribbled into their first draft.   By then, alarm bells were triggered.

Two out of every 10 married women—mostly in the D and E economic brackets—want no more children, the surveys show. But they can not access family planning services. 

All agree this spurs underground abortion. The toll, in this massacre, is about 1,930 or more a day, UP Population Institute estimates “A voice was heard in Ramah, wailing and loud lamentation.  Rachel weeping for her children…because they were no more,” Matthew wrote of   Herod’s Massacre of the Innocents.

Parents should decide on the number of children, reproductive rights supporters demand today. That’s the position defined earlier by Vatican II:  Keeping in mind the good of both family and community, couples determine the size of their families, says Council document: “The Church in the Modern World”.

“Procreation and parenthood do not entail a right to have as many children as one desires,” wrote theologian Fr. Aloysius Cartagenas. He called for a “fair hearing for 2-child proposal.” The right to be a parent should be balanced with rights of the whole society.  Contrary to popular Catholic belief, the former need not take moral precedence over the later all the time.”

The Church supports family planning but bucks contraception.  Ipil Prelature and Cagayan de Oro archdiocese vigorously implement these principles in their “All Natural Family Planning” program.  Can other dioceses say they match their “anathemas” with action programs?

There’s far more common ground, in this debate, than the sound-bytes indicate. The areas of agreement demand we grope for consensus thru the bridge that true dialog builds.

“The distance between man and man is infinite”, Nobel Laureate Rabindranath Tagore once wrote.  And if God “as eternal bridge did not span the abyss, how could we reach one another”?       

E-mail: juan_mercado@prime.net.ph         

 

Ilocos Times copyright 2008

Back to top

Opinions / Columns

 

Work and rest

 

GMA cares and poor governance

 

5000 people dead

 

How late bloomer can bring young wife to America without really trying

 

Leaving square one

 

Promoting dialogue

 

A 5-in-1 solution

 

The lost name

 

Pedaling our way through the crisis

 

SIP